WR245 Student Poems Banner


 

Rhythmic Imitation Poems



Student Poetry

This Project:

WR245

More

Home
  Objectives:
  • To explore the rhythm that enhances the meaning of a piece
  • To use stress and unstress in an irregular way
  • To feel another poetic element in the body
  • To layer the subtlety of rhythm into the impact of the poem

Although Rhythmic Imitation is not a specific form, it is an exercise used in almost all poetry writing classes to help students understand how rhythm can be a very real part of the structure of a poem.

Some poems often imitated are The Red Wagon by William Carlos Williams, Dolor by Theodore Roethke and Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night by Dylan Thomas. All three poems have specific meter/syllable/stress and unstressed words and lines.

Students in Poetry classes are often required to write in the “style” of a specific poet and e.e. cummings is probably the most frequently used because his style is so distinctive. Rhythmic Imitation, however, goes further than copying a style. It copies the exact stressed and unstressed syllables of each line. The first challenge is understanding those stresses to see if there is a meter or “cadence” to the lines. For students wishing to delve even deeper into a piece, copying the poets word choices within the rhythm provides an even greater challenge . . . verb for verb, noun for noun, etc. because those word choices lend meaning to the rhythm that is established.

For this class, students were asked to write a rhythmic imitation of one of the following poems using their own choice of topic but attempting to adhere to their chosen individual themes:
  • My Papa’s Waltz by Theodore Roethke
  • if everything happens that can’t be done by e.e. cummings
  • Blues on Yellow by Marilyn Chin
  • Improvisation excerpt by Ntozake Shange
The results were surprising, and some a lot of fun, but we found the process difficult and for good reasons, many of us chose to revise with our own choice of rhythm and voice.

It was this form of writing, however, that prompted discussions regarding the “form” or framework of poetry and what makes something a poem rather than just prose chopped into shorter or random lines. Although we had already been evaluating poetry on the basis of other elements that set it apart, it was this exercise that provided more clarity to the process. Here are some of the elements of evaluation that we used as criteria for critiquing others’ work and our own poems as we chose them for inclusion and placement in our portfolios:
  • Images (metaphor, tangible evidence – showing, not telling)
  • Sounds (alliteration/repetition, assonance)
  • Words (active verbs, solid nouns)
  • Rhythm/meter (stressed/unstressed syllables)
  • Line breaks (end-stops/punctuation)
  • Enjambment
  • Codes (hidden messages/meanings)
  • Logic (does it make sense?)
  • Music (language/diction/dialogue)
  • Appearance (shape on the page/line lengths)
  • Readability (awkward places?)


Link to Concrete Poetry Link to haiku Link to Pantoum Link to Sestina Link to Sonnet


 

         Links for student examples:
 
Student Poetry for this Project

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10

Copyright © 2005 The Students of WR245
Spring Term 2005. All rights reserved.
Clackamas Community College, Oregon City, Oregon


Web design by Doran Web Works.